Showing posts with label Heinlein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heinlein. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Anathem a Modern-Day Number of the Beast


I was a big fan of Neal Stephenson during his cyber phase (Snow Crash, The Diamond Age). I completely skipped out on his historical phase (Cryptonomicon and the Baroque Cycle), but wanted to catch up with his most recent book, Anathem, which I can only hope is the beginning of a new philosophical phase.

In my review below I've kept spoilers to a minimum, but it would be impossible to discuss such a lengthy book without delving past the initial mysteries. So be warned that there are some spoilers below.

I was particularly tickled by Anathem because of the way it treated alternate universes. That's not to discount the fact that I got a huge kick out of Stephenson's invented language. Of course Stephenson also wove physics, technology, and mathematics into his adventure- and he drew the plot together with a fascinating dose of philosophy and spirituality. This may sound like a lot of topics to cover while writing the story of an alien invasion- but Stephenson took 960 pages to draw all these subjects into an intriguing plot, and he made (nearly) every page exciting while doing it.

For years I cited Robert Heinlein as my favorite science fiction writer. He largely won that place through Number of the Beast, in which he explored the consequences of small party that learned to travel between the multitude of alternate universes. Heinlein leaned toward a fantasy aesthetic in his interpretation of alternate universes, having his party travel to worlds such as Oz, become real because his characters imagined them. I was enamoured by the idea that imaginary people could dream imaginary characters into existence- especially when those characters shared my own fictional references.

Stephenson does not fail to pull the heart strings of the familiar when writing a tale of alternate universe interaction. But first he extrapolates a carefully researched scientific and philosophical framework to explain how interaction between different universes becomes possible.

Another difference between Number of the Beast and Anathem- Heinlein starts his adventure from our universe, and travels to a multitude of others. In Anathem, the story begins in Arbre, a world hauntingly similar to ours- but which is clearly not Earth past, present, or future. Stephenson creates this sense of other-worldliness through the vocabulary of his created Arbran language. After spending months reading Anathem, "reticulum" seems a perfectly valid synonym for the Internet, and I might almost ask my husband if he felt like going to see a "speely" (movie). Continuing his manipulation of linguistics, Stephenson then cleverly creates a sense of pleasant notstalgia and connection when Earth words (in French) begin to seep into the Arbran vocabulary. Stephenson then deepens this sense of familiarity using the same trick Heinlein used- by tipping his hat to golden age spec fiction. Gets me every time.

Released in September 2008, Anathem is now 17th on Amazon's science fiction bestseller list. Interestingly, as of today, the Kindle edition of the book is not even in the top 100 of the Kindle's science fiction bestseller list. I, myself, read the book in print. The discrepancy may be explained by the fact that the Calcas (mathematical proofs) in the back of the book are more comfortable to flip to (and in some cases easier to view) in paper format. Perhaps readers were lured by the bundling of the book with companion CD (IOLET: Music from the World of Anathem) when the book was released. Perhaps there is simply more satisfaction weighing a huge, 960-page book in one's hands than comparing its storage space to other books saved to memory. At any rate, Anathem is selling much better in print than in Kindle format.

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Stranger in a Familiar Land

Whenever anyone asks me my favorite science fiction author, I reply: Heinlein.  This gets mixed reactions: from understanding approval to poorly hidden disgust.  Heinlein seems to evoke strong love or hate emotions in his readers.

But love or hate, most of my interlocutors can't mention Heinlein without talking about Stranger in a Strange Land- a book I have never read because it couldn't hold my interest past the first few chapters.

On a quest to understand whether or not books whose first chapters don't grab me are or are not worth reading (see my post Stardust in our eyes), I picked up Stranger in a Strange Land.  I muscled through the first several chapters, and read through to the end.

The result of the experiment was clear.  My feelings toward the book softened a little as I continued to read, got to know the characters and situations better, and to recognize certain Heinlein characteristics that I've come to know and love.  But I never felt a fraction of the warmth toward the book that I did toward Heinlein's Friday (read five times and counting), The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, To Sail Beyond the Sunset, The Number of the Beast or the adventurous sf Heinlein books geared toward children.  

The first few chapters of Stranger in a Strange Land didn't grab me, and neither did the rest of the book.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Stranger Than Fiction

The very first time I picked up a book by my favorite science fiction author, Robert Heinlein, I didn't like it. The book was Number of the Beast. It had been recommended by a friend, but I just didn't' see where Heinlein was going with all the drivel about who was in charge of what on the Gay Deceiver. There were only four people, for crying out loud. Zebadiah, Deety and her Dad, and Hilda were running for their lives, and all they could talk about was marriage and rank. Come on. Four people. Get in the Gay Deceiver and get away from the black hats, or the lot of you deserve to be blown to smithereens!

Eventually I slogged through the pecking order chapters and began an adventure that changed the way I think about fiction. The more I read in the genre, the more I saw this theme of selecting the appropriate crew for the mission into the unknown. See, when a small group of people is suddenly isolated from their family, friends, boss- in short, from the entire cultural fabric of civilization- that tiny group becomes civilization unto itself. They have to provide all needs for each other, professional and psychological, and do so very far away from home. There's a lot of discussion about who should be chosen based on skill set and social lubrication. Do we send all men? All women? Couples in even number? Married or unmarried?

In 2005 Technovelgy.com addressed this issue and quoted from Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land to illustrate the similarities between problems faced by Heinlein's fictional mission to Mars and the actual mission to Mars being proposed in 2005.

So when I read about Astronaut Lisa Nowak in the news, it brings to mind questions that science fiction writers have been asking for a long time: what's the best way to avoid conflict in social systems when a small group of people loses contact with our established social supports? The buzz about a mission to Mars in 2005 produced several articles on the challenge of keeping a group of people far from home for a proposed three years. Jay C. Buckley cited psychological adaptation first in his list of biomedical dangers to the crew. You got it, psychological concerns came before bone and muscle mass loss and cellular damage from radiation. Buckley believed the psychological challenge could be overcome through the use of training and a careful selection process. The reason you'll find Nowak in the "science and space" column of USA Today instead of on the crime blotter, is because she looks like an example of bad selection process. NASA mentions this problem in the article I cited above, saying

NASA spokesman Doug...Peterson said it's also too early to know whether NASA's process for choosing astronauts would be affected by Nowak's situation....Astronaut selection is highly rigorous.

Yet NASA flight surgeon, Johnathan Clarke, says
the agency has turned a blind eye to both astronauts' mental troubles and their extramarital affairs


So as little as I enjoy the details of the psychological breakdown of a woman and the resulting assault, it's clear that this news story will be in the minds of those who select the pioneers of the future, and those who are writing about them.

Monday, November 13, 2006

Variable Star

"I wanted to read a new Heinlein novel so badly that I didn't care if I had to finish it myself."
-Spider Robinson

I grabbed this quote from a Slashdot article on the Heinlein manuscript Robinson completed. Variable Star was released on September 19th, 2006 by TOR. I read the first chapter before the release but haven't yet read the book. Trying to avoid spoilers, I've merely glanced at the reviews. My impression that this is classic, yummy Heinlein has been confirmed by reviewers on Slashdot and Amazon, but there are some disgruntled readers who complain that the history timeline includes modern events that Heinlein would have never known to include.